"The
past is never dead. It's not even past."
William
Faulkner
In the 1960s Carl Rogers introduced the term ‘congruence’ to indicate a person’s harmony with themselves. Roughly it means honesty, transparency – authenticity. To be in-congruent is to dissemble or to hide under a false appearance. A sign of incongruence would be, for example, smiling when one is annoyed or depressed.
For
me, the greatest enemy of congruence is my strength of will to overcome my past.
The one thing I don’t want to be is congruent with my frailty and dependence. This
is who I still am, but it is not who I want to be.
I
learned early on to protect my ego, my sense of self, by rejecting and
disowning my weaknesses. As I grew up I also learned to be independent of those
I needed. When they hurt me I was eventually strong enough to say ‘I don’t need them’ and to make it true. This
ability became so entrenched that it developed into an automatic mechanism, so
that my emotions are instantly cut off whenever I am reminded of my weakness
and dependency. Then, I believe I really don’t care – but it’s a lie.
What
really kicks in is fear and anxiety; and this goes back to my birth. Birth is a
time when one is closest to death. Birth is a massive trauma. But now, when it is
emotionally restimulated my feelings shut off. What I cannot shut off are the
physical effects. I cannot remember the original circumstance of my terrors –
but any slight reminder in present-time and my feelings automatically switch
off; but not the physical effects:
heartache, emptiness, fear and anxiety. These I do suffer, without knowing why.
The event in present time that triggers the
restimulation might only be that my partner shows a disinterest or contradicts
something I was saying – that’s all.
But
it’s enough. Instantly, before I am even aware of it, the shutting-off
mechanism goes into effect. I don’t even know it’s happened. All I feel is perhaps a slight irritation; nothing
more – she often does that kind of thing –
but that’s all right!
Underneath, however, it isn’t all right. It goes
deep; but I do not suffer it. My wall protects me from the threat of dying. The
only effect I get is that hours later I feel depressed, my chest hurts – and I
don’t know why. That night I can’t sleep.
My
incongruence is not consciously purposeful. If you were to ask me if my wife
has upset me I would answer in some general sort of way – without much feeling.
No! Not really upset – annoyed perhaps. As
for my chest pains, maybe I should see a doctor; but I often get it and it goes
away. I disparage its importance.
Since
my wife is the most important person in my life, the one I most look to for
reassurance, this situation happens quite often. It is an aspect of my unconscious
incongruence that I am unaware how much I am dependant on her. And any sharp reminder
of it restimulates fear – which, paradoxically I cannot feel. In fact,
throughout my life there have been hundreds of times when the same sort of
event has happened – with kids at school, girlfriends, teachers and the like.
You
may ask why I have such a wall up against the feeling of dependency. The answer
is that like most people, I don’t want to know
my early childhood; how utterly dependant I was. I don’t want to deal
with my fears of death and extinction again. But later in life, each reminder
of it, each time someone disowns or misunderstands me, the ground opens up and it’s
as though I’m there again.
So,
even in my early days there grew a chain of events where I perceive myself as facing
abandonment and death.
Eventually
I developed an ego strong enough to be able to say, ‘I don’t care’ – and a will strong enough to make it true. My
automatic cut-off clears me of my past. It’s all behind me now – except I have
these queer psychosomatic problems.
*
This
is how it was. But things have changed – I have changed. I have learned to be
more honest with myself, to be more in tune with my felt-sense of how things
are with me; to admit when something hurts, that it hurts; to admit to myself
and to others my weaknesses and sensitivity. My therapist helped me, but thankfully
she let me do all the work myself. With total acceptance from her I found it
easier and easier to be myself. It took
quite a while, gradually learning to be authentic; but every step in taking
down the wall was a step in the right direction.
*
ps.
I trust the reader will be aware that the above is not autobiographical. I dramatise
a fictional first person because stories tell truths better that abstract
descriptions. And I wanted to tell a common theme without revealing anyone’s private
story.

No comments:
Post a Comment